CVE-2026-84783 json
Use-After-Free in X.509 Extension Cache Under Concurrent Use
published 2026-09-29 40 d ago modified 2026-10-08 32 d ago also EUVD-2026-89014
- cvss
- 7.5
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.3%
- EPSS 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 21%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while another thread is still using it.
Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a Denial of Service.
CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free
Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate's X.509v3 extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory.
Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its extensions are decoded. In TLS the certificates at risk are the trusted CA certificates supplied for chain verification, by whatever means, since these are shared by every connection and their extensions are decoded and cached the first time a chain is built to them. Certificates sent by the peer are decoded separately for each connection and are not shared, so they are not affected. In a TLS client verifying server certificates, or a TLS server that requests and verifies client certificates, the use-after-free could only occur if the first chains built to the same trusted CA are built by several connections at the same time.
FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as X.509 certificate handling is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
OpenSSL 4.0 is vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.
OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.3.
This issue was reported on 27 August 2026 by Tim Becker (Xint.io) and independently in a public report on 31 August 2026 by aydinmercan.
The fix has been developed by Bob Beck.
-- cut (non-publishing metadata for internal use) -- Reported by: Tim Becker (Xint.io), aydinmercan Fixed by: Bob Beck
Patch / fix
- OpenSSL OpenSSL 4.0.3
- openssl3 hummingbird 1 3.5.8-1.hum1
- openssl3-libs hummingbird 1 3.5.8-1.hum1
- openssl3-devel-engine hummingbird 1 3.5.8-1.hum1
- openssl hummingbird 1 3.5.8-0.1.hum1
- openssl-libs hummingbird 1 3.5.8-0.1.hum1
- openssl-perl hummingbird 1 3.5.8-0.1.hum1
- openssl-config-fips hummingbird 1 3.5.8-0.1.hum1
- openssl-devel-engine hummingbird 1 3.5.8-0.1.hum1
red hat advisories RHSA-2026:70734RHSA-2026:59641
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2026-84783 updated cvss 5.9
openssl: openssl: Denial of Service via race condition in certificate extension caching
-
Red Hat Developer Hub 1 rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9affected: workaround, no fix available “Fix deferred”
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 openssl, openssl-perl, openssl 3.5.8-1.el10_2affected: workaround, no fix planned “Out of support scope”
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 ovmf, OVMF, shim, AAVMF, mokutil, openssl, +6 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 openssl, shim-x64, edk2-ovmf, shim-aa64, shim-ia32, edk2-aarch64, +13 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 shim-x64, edk2-ovmf, shim-aa64, edk2-tools, edk2-aarch64, compat-openssl11, +5 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 shim 16.1-4.el10, edk2 20251114-5.el10_2.2, shim-unsigned-x64 16.1-1.el10, shim-unsigned-aarch64 16.1-2.el10 Red Hat JBoss Core Services jbcs-httpd24-openssl, jbcs-httpd24-openssl-libs, jbcs-httpd24-openssl-perl Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8, openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9affected: workaround, no fix available “Fix deferred”
+2 more productsfewer
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 5 openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9 Red Hat Satellite 6 puppet-agent, openvox-agent 8.28.1-1.el9sat -
Red Hat Hardened Images openssl3 3.5.8-1.hum1, openssl 3.5.8-0.1.hum1, openssl3-libs 3.5.8-1.hum1, openssl-libs 3.5.8-0.1.hum1, openssl-perl 3.5.8-0.1.hum1, openssl-config-fips 3.5.8-0.1.hum1, +3 morefixed: vendor fix RHSA-2026:59641
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 openssl, openssl-libs, openssl-perl, openssl 3.5.8-1.el10_2 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 openssl 3.5.8-1.el10_2 Red Hat Hardened Images unbound 1.26.1-1.hum1not affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 40 d ago
Exploit prediction
0.29% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 21% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CISA ADP | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| CNA | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
Affected products
- OpenSSL OpenSSL
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-416 Use After Free
- Technology feeds
References
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-84783
- NVD CVE-2026-84783
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.