Skip to content
Fencer Vulns
high 7.6

CVE-2026-58141 json

Dify < 1.15.0 SSRF Protection Bypass via Remote-Files Endpoints

published 2026-11-06 2 d ago modified 2026-11-08 22 h ago also EUVD-2026-118326

cvss
7.6
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.4%
EPSS 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 34%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

Dify before 1.15.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows any authenticated console user to bypass SSRF protections and issue arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints due to the Squid proxy configuration only defining source ACLs without destination deny rules and the make_request() helper performing no independent destination IP validation. Attackers can use endpoints such as GET /console/api/remote-files/<url>, POST /console/api/remote-files/upload, the HTTP Request workflow node, website crawl, or document import from URL to reach internal components like the sandbox, internal APIs, and PostgreSQL, and on AWS deployments read IAM credentials from the instance metadata service, with the HTTP Request node further enabling POST, PUT, and DELETE writes to internal services relying on network isolation for authorization.

Patch / fix

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
2 d ago

Exploit prediction

0.40% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 34% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 4.0 7.2 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CNA 3.1 7.6 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
CNA 4.0 7.2 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Affected products

  • langgenius dify

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery

References

Sources

Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.