CVE-2026-55551 json
ZAC: Missing per-zaaktype authorization on by-ID decision and process reads
published 2026-10-30 9 d ago modified 2026-11-06 2 d ago also EUVD-2026-114196
- cvss
- 6.5
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.3%
- EPSS 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 17%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
ZAC is an open-source, workflow-based Common Ground component for Dutch municipal case management. Prior to 5.2.0, by-id read endpoints in `src/main/kotlin/nl/info/zac/app/zaak/ZaakRestService.kt` omit `assertPolicy`(`policyService.readZaakRechten(zaak).lezen`) authorization. `RequestAuthorizationFilter` and `hasAnyApplicationRole` require only an application role on any zaaktype, not the target case's type, while `zaak-rechten.rego` enforces the actual `zaaktype_allowed` boundary only when invoked. An authenticated low-privileged municipal user who knows a case or decision UUID can use `GET /rest/zaken/besluit/zaakUuid/{uuid}` (`listBesluitenForZaakUUID`) to read decisions including types, dates, and free-text toelichting; `GET /rest/zaken/besluit/{uuid}/historie` (`listBesluitHistorie`) to read audit old/new values; and `GET /rest/zaken/{uuid}/process-diagram` (`downloadProcessDiagram`) to read BPMN workflow state across unauthorized zaaktypes. The advisory also identifies `zaak/{uuid}/afzender` (`listAfzendersVoorZaak`) as exposing zaaktype mailbox configuration without a policy check. The search/_zoek path is correctly authorization-filtered and is not part of this by-id read cluster. This issue is fixed in version 5.2.0.
Patch / fix
- github.com/infonl/dimpact-zaakafhandelcomponent@7b90586 commit
- github.com/infonl/dimpact-zaakafhandelcomponent@d050f24 commit
- github.com/infonl/dimpact-zaakafhandelcomponent#6225 pull request
- github.com/infonl/dimpact-zaakafhandelcomponent#6229 pull request
- github.com/infonl/dimpact-zaakafhandelcomponent/releases/tag/v5.2.0 release
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- Proof of concept is public
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 2 d ago
Exploit prediction
0.26% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 17% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
Exploits and checks
- github.com https://github.com/infonl/dimpact-zaakafhandelcomponent/security/advisories/GHSA-cv9m-35q4-cxfm referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 6.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N |
Affected products
- infonl dimpact-zaakafhandelcomponent
Classification
References
- github.com /infonl/dimpact-zaakafhandelcomponent/pull/6225
- github.com /infonl/dimpact-zaakafhandelcomponent/pull/6229
- github.com /infonl/dimpact-zaakafhandelcomponent/commit/7b90586be658cec9fa5c98c0838636237f40931f
- github.com /infonl/dimpact-zaakafhandelcomponent/commit/d050f247301a1bcfb867015725a693c540a06f5a
-
github.com
/infonl/dimpact-zaakafhandelcomponent/security/advisories/GHSA-cv9m-35q4-cxfm
exploit
- github.com /infonl/dimpact-zaakafhandelcomponent/releases/tag/v5.2.0
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2026-55551
- NVD CVE-2026-55551
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.