Skip to content
Fencer Vulns
high 7.5

CVE-2026-33626 in the critical feed json

LMDeploy Vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via Vision-Language Image Loading

published 2026-04-20 6 mo ago modified 2026-10-26 13 d ago also EUVD-2026-23970 , GHSA-6w67-hwm5-92mq , PYSEC-2026-2607

cvss
7.5
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
45.3%
EPSS 45.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 98%
public exploits
0
none known, plus a Nuclei check

Summary

LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving large language models. Versions prior to 0.12.3 have a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in LMDeploy's vision-language module. The `load_image()` function in `lmdeploy/vl/utils.py` fetches arbitrary URLs without validating internal/private IP addresses, allowing attackers to access cloud metadata services, internal networks, and sensitive resources. Version 0.12.3 patches the issue.

Patch / fix

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
Proof of concept is public
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
6 mo ago

Exploit prediction

45.25% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 98% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).

Exploits and checks

  • Nuclei template LMDeploy - Server-Side Request Forgery nuclei detection template
  • github.com https://github.com/InternLM/lmdeploy/security/advisories/GHSA-6w67-hwm5-92mq referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.1 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
GitHub 3.1 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
OSV 3.1 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
pypi lmdeploy
<=0.12.2
no fix listed

Affected products

  • InternLM lmdeploy

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery

References

Sources

Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.

CPEs and fixed versions use Anchore's correction of NVD's data: Added CPE configurations because not yet analyzed by NVD.