Skip to content
Fencer Vulns
medium 6.1

CVE-2026-33230 json

nltk Vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting

published 2026-03-18 7 mo ago modified 2026-09-10 1 mo ago also GHSA-gfwx-w7gr-fvh7 , PYSEC-2026-2235 , EUVD-2026-13883

cvss
6.1
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.3%
EPSS 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 28%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit) is a suite of open source Python modules, data sets, and tutorials supporting research and development in Natural Language Processing. In versions 3.9.3 and prior, `nltk.app.wordnet_app` contains a reflected cross-site scripting issue in the `lookup_...` route. A crafted `lookup_<payload>` URL can inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript into the response page because attacker-controlled `word` data is reflected into HTML without escaping. This impacts users running the local WordNet Browser server and can lead to script execution in the browser origin of that application. Commit 1c3f799607eeb088cab2491dcf806ae83c29ad8f fixes the issue.

Patch / fix

  • pypi nltk 3.9.4
  • nltk Debian 14 3.10.0-1

debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2026-33230

  • nltk Ubuntu Pro 14.04 LTS 2.0~b9-0ubuntu4.1~esm6
  • nltk Ubuntu Pro 16.04 LTS 3.1-1ubuntu0.1+esm4
  • nltk Ubuntu Pro 18.04 LTS 3.2.5-1ubuntu0.1+esm4
  • nltk Ubuntu Pro 20.04 LTS 3.4.5-2ubuntu0.1~esm4
  • nltk Ubuntu Pro 22.04 LTS 3.7-1ubuntu0.1~esm2
  • nltk Ubuntu Pro 24.04 LTS 3.8.1-1ubuntu0.1~esm2
  • nltk Ubuntu Pro 26.04 LTS 3.9.2-1ubuntu0.1~esm2

ubuntu advisories UBUNTU-CVE-2026-33230

Ubuntu security data © Canonical Ltd., from https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-security-notices via OSV; changed: normalised to fixed package versions per release. CC BY-SA 4.0

  • python-nltk openSUSE Tumbleweed 3.9.4-1.1

opensuse advisories openSUSE-SU-2026:10461-1

Vendor advisories

What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.

red hat product security vex CVE-2026-33230 updated cvss 6.1

nltk: NLTK: Script execution via reflected cross-site scripting in WordNet Browser

  • Red Hat Lightspeed Core lightspeed-core/rag-tool-rhel9, lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack-rhel9 Red Hat OpenShift Lightspeed openshift-lightspeed/lightspeed-ocp-rag-rhel9, openshift-lightspeed/lightspeed-service-api-rhel9, openshift-lightspeed-tech-preview/lightspeed-rag-tool-rhel9 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 ansible-automation-platform/ee-minimal-rhel8, ansible-automation-platform/ee-minimal-rhel9, ansible-automation-platform-24/de-minimal-rhel8, ansible-automation-platform-24/de-minimal-rhel9, ansible-automation-platform-24/ee-minimal-rhel8, ansible-automation-platform-24/ee-minimal-rhel9, +23 more Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) rhoai/odh-ta-lmes-job-rhel9, rhoai/odh-llama-stack-core-rhel9, rhoai/odh-trustyai-nemo-guardrails-server-rhel9, rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-llmcompressor-cuda-py312-rhel9, rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-pytorch-llmcompressor-cuda-py312-rhel9
    affected: workaround, no fix available “Fix deferred”

Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
Proof of concept is public
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
7 mo ago

Exploit prediction

0.34% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 28% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).

Exploits and checks

  • github.com https://github.com/nltk/nltk/security/advisories/GHSA-gfwx-w7gr-fvh7 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.1 6.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
GitHub 3.1 6.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
OSV 3.1 6.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
pypi nltk
<3.9.4
3.9.4

Affected products

  • nltk nltk

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation

References

Sources

Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.