Skip to content
Fencer Vulns
low 3.1

CVE-2025-59270 json

psPAS does not enforce TLS 1.2 within Get-PASSAMLResponse

published 2025-09-16 13 mo ago modified 2026-06-17 4 mo ago also EUVD-2025-29615

cvss
3.1
version 3.1, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
0.2%
EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 14%
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

psPAS PowerShell module does not explicitly enforce TLS 1.2 within the 'Get-PASSAMLResponse' function during the SAML authentication process. An unauthenticated attacker in a 'Man-in-the-Middle' position could manipulate the TLS handshake and downgrade TLS to a deprecated protocol. Fixed in 7.0.209.

Patch / fix

  • pspete psPAS 7.0.209

Vendor advisories

What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.

cisa vex VA-25-258-01 updated cvss 3.1

psPAS does not enforce TLS 1.2 within Get-PASSAMLResponse

  • pspete psPAS >=6.4.85, <7.0.209
    affected: vendor fix
  • pspete psPAS 7.0.209
    fixed: vendor fix github.com

From CISA ICS and IT advisories (CSAF, https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF), a U.S. Government work; changed: reduced to products, statuses and remediations. CISA notification · csaf

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
Proof of concept is public
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial
Assessed
13 mo ago

Exploit prediction

0.24% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 14% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.1 3.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CNA 4.0 2.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CNA 4.0 2.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Affected products

  • pspete psPAS

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-757 Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation

References

Sources

Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.