CVE-2025-40214 json
af_unix: Initialise scc_index in unix_add_edge().
published 2025-12-04 11 mo ago modified 2026-10-19 20 d ago also EUVD-2025-201158
- cvss
- 7.8
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.2%
- EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 8%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
af_unix: Initialise scc_index in unix_add_edge().
Quang Le reported that the AF_UNIX GC could garbage-collect a receive queue of an alive in-flight socket, with a nice repro.
The repro consists of three stages.
1) 1-a. Create a single cyclic reference with many sockets 1-b. close() all sockets 1-c. Trigger GC
2) 2-a. Pass sk-A to an embryo sk-B 2-b. Pass sk-X to sk-X 2-c. Trigger GC
3) 3-a. accept() the embryo sk-B 3-b. Pass sk-B to sk-C 3-c. close() the in-flight sk-A 3-d. Trigger GC
As of 2-c, sk-A and sk-X are linked to unix_unvisited_vertices, and unix_walk_scc() groups them into two different SCCs:
unix_sk(sk-A)->vertex->scc_index = 2 (UNIX_VERTEX_INDEX_START) unix_sk(sk-X)->vertex->scc_index = 3
Once GC completes, unix_graph_grouped is set to true. Also, unix_graph_maybe_cyclic is set to true due to sk-X's cyclic self-reference, which makes close() trigger GC.
At 3-b, unix_add_edge() allocates unix_sk(sk-B)->vertex and links it to unix_unvisited_vertices.
unix_update_graph() is called at 3-a. and 3-b., but neither unix_graph_grouped nor unix_graph_maybe_cyclic is changed because both sk-B's listener and sk-C are not in-flight.
3-c decrements sk-A's file refcnt to 1.
Since unix_graph_grouped is true at 3-d, unix_walk_scc_fast() is finally called and iterates 3 sockets sk-A, sk-B, and sk-X:
sk-A -> sk-B (-> sk-C) sk-X -> sk-X
This is totally fine. All of them are not yet close()d and should be grouped into different SCCs.
However, unix_vertex_dead() misjudges that sk-A and sk-B are in the same SCC and sk-A is dead.
unix_sk(sk-A)->scc_index == unix_sk(sk-B)->scc_index <-- Wrong! && sk-A's file refcnt == unix_sk(sk-A)->vertex->out_degree ^-- 1 in-flight count for sk-B -> sk-A is dead !?
The problem is that unix_add_edge() does not initialise scc_index.
Stage 1) is used for heap spraying, making a newly allocated vertex have vertex->scc_index == 2 (UNIX_VERTEX_INDEX_START) set by unix_walk_scc() at 1-c.
Let's track the max SCC index from the previous unix_walk_scc() call and assign the max + 1 to a new vertex's scc_index.
This way, we can continue to avoid Tarjan's algorithm while preventing misjudgments.
Patch / fix
- Linux Linux 6.1.159, 6.6.117, 6.12.59, 6.17.9, 6.18
- Siemens RUGGEDCOM RST2428P V4.0
- linux Debian 12 6.1.159-1
- linux Debian 13 6.12.63-1
- linux Debian 14 6.17.9-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2025-40214
- linux Ubuntu 25.10 6.17.0-12.12
- linux-aws Ubuntu 25.10 6.17.0-1006.6
- linux-gcp Ubuntu 25.10 6.17.0-1006.6
- linux-azure Ubuntu 25.10 6.17.0-1007.7
- linux-raspi Ubuntu 25.10 6.17.0-1007.7
- linux-riscv Ubuntu 25.10 6.17.0-12.12.1
- linux-oracle Ubuntu 25.10 6.17.0-1006.6
- linux-aws-6.17 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 6.17.0-1007.7~24.04.1
ubuntu advisories UBUNTU-CVE-2025-40214
Ubuntu security data © Canonical Ltd., from https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-security-notices via OSV; changed: normalised to fixed package versions per release. CC BY-SA 4.0
- kernel-livepatch-SLE16_Update_2 SLES 16.0, Linux Micro 6.2, SLES for SAP applications 16.0 4-160000.1.1
- kernel-livepatch-SLE16_Update_1 SLES 16.0, Linux Micro 6.2, SLES for SAP applications 16.0 6-160000.1.1
- kernel-livepatch-SLE16_Update_0 SLES 16.0, Linux Micro 6.2, SLES for SAP applications 16.0 8-160000.4.3
- kernel-livepatch-SLE16_Update_3 SLES 16.0, Linux Micro 6.2, SLES for SAP applications 16.0 3-160000.1.1
- kernel-livepatch-SLE16-RT_Update_1 Linux Micro 6.2 5-160000.1.1
- kernel-livepatch-SLE16-RT_Update_0 Linux Micro 6.2 6-160000.3.4
- kernel-livepatch-SLE16-RT_Update_2 Linux Micro 6.2 3-160000.1.1
- kernel-livepatch-SLE16-RT_Update_3 Linux Micro 6.2 2-160000.1.1
suse advisories SUSE-SU-2026:20842-1SUSE-SU-2026:20947-1SUSE-SU-2026:20840-1SUSE-SU-2026:20945-1SUSE-SU-2026:20841-1SUSE-SU-2026:20946-1
- kernel-rt openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.9.1
- dtb-aarch64 openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.9.1
- kernel-64kb openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.9.1
- kernel-syms openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.9.1
- kernel-azure openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.9.1
- kernel-obs-qa openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.9.1
- kernel-source openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.9.1
- kernel-default openSUSE Leap 16.0 6.12.0-160000.9.1
opensuse advisories openSUSE-SU-2026:20145-1
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/20003fbb9174121b27bd1da6ebe61542ac4c327d commit
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/4cd8d755c7d4f515dd9abf483316aca2f1b7b0f3 commit
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/db81ad20fd8aef7cc7d536c52ee5ea4c1f979128 commit
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/1aa7e40ee850c9053e769957ce6541173891204d commit
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/60e6489f8e3b086bd1130ad4450a2c112e863791 commit
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2025-40214 updated cvss 5.8
kernel: af_unix: Initialise scc_index in unix_add_edge()
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 perf, kernel, python-perf, kernel-kdump, kernel-firmware, kernel-bootwrapper, +1 moreaffected: no fix planned “Out of support scope”
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 kernelaffected: no fix available “Fix deferred”
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 perf, kernel, bpftool, kernel-rt, python-perf, kernel-kdump, +8 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 perf, kernel, bpftool, kernel-rt, kernel-core, kernel-tools, +29 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 rv, perf, rtla, kernel, bpftool, libperf, +83 morenot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
cisa ICSA-26-188-05 updated cvss 7.0
Siemens SINEC OS
-
Siemens RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00) < 4.0affected: fixed in V4.0 support.industry.siemens.com
Facts from CISA's republication of the vendor's own advisory (CSAF); the linked advisory is the authoritative source. CISA notification · csaf
Exploit prediction
0.19% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 8% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 7.8 | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
Affected products
- Linux Linux
- Siemens RUGGEDCOM RST2428P
Classification
- Technology feeds
References
- git.kernel.org /stable/c/20003fbb9174121b27bd1da6ebe61542ac4c327d
- git.kernel.org /stable/c/4cd8d755c7d4f515dd9abf483316aca2f1b7b0f3
- git.kernel.org /stable/c/db81ad20fd8aef7cc7d536c52ee5ea4c1f979128
- git.kernel.org /stable/c/1aa7e40ee850c9053e769957ce6541173891204d
- git.kernel.org /stable/c/60e6489f8e3b086bd1130ad4450a2c112e863791
- mohandacherir.github.io /Qdiv7/posts/unix_new_gc/
- cert-portal.siemens.com /productcert/html/ssa-253495.html
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2025-40214
- NVD CVE-2025-40214
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.