CVE-2025-13308 json
Application Passwords <= 0.1.3 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via reject_url
published 2025-12-06 11 mo ago modified 2026-10-15 24 d ago also EUVD-2025-201527
- cvss
- 5.4
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.2%
- EPSS 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 15%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
The Application Passwords plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the 'reject_url' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 0.1.3. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied URLs, which allows javascript: URI schemes to be embedded in the reject_url parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts that execute when a user clicks the "No, I do not approve of this connection" button, granted they can successfully trick the victim into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 11 mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.24% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 15% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 5.4 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N |
Affected products
- georgestephanis Application Passwords
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation
- Technology feeds
References
- wordfence.com /threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/59fdfdf3-e9fe-44d2-82f4-7a612a51d376?source=cve
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org /browser/application-passwords/tags/0.1.3/auth-app.js#L61
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org /browser/application-passwords/tags/0.1.3/class.application-passwords.php#L418
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org /browser/application-passwords/tags/0.1.3/class.application-passwords.php#L432
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2025-13308
- NVD CVE-2025-13308
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.