CVE-2025-1180 json
GNU Binutils ld elf-eh-frame.c _bfd_elf_write_section_eh_frame memory corruption
published 2025-02-11 20 mo ago modified 2026-06-17 4 mo ago also EUVD-2025-2054
- cvss
- 3.1
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.7%
- EPSS 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 53%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in GNU Binutils 2.43. This affects the function _bfd_elf_write_section_eh_frame of the file bfd/elf-eh-frame.c of the component ld. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.
Patch / fix
- binutils Debian 14 2.45-3
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2025-1180
- binutils Ubuntu 22.04 LTS 2.38-4ubuntu2.8
- binutils Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 2.42-4ubuntu2.5
- binutils Ubuntu Pro 14.04 LTS 2.24-5ubuntu14.2+esm7
- binutils Ubuntu Pro 16.04 LTS 2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.8+esm13
- binutils Ubuntu Pro 18.04 LTS 2.30-21ubuntu1~18.04.9+esm5
- binutils Ubuntu Pro 20.04 LTS 2.34-6ubuntu1.11+esm1
ubuntu advisories UBUNTU-CVE-2025-1180
Ubuntu security data © Canonical Ltd., from https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-security-notices via OSV; changed: normalised to fixed package versions per release. CC BY-SA 4.0
- binutils SLES 16.0, Linux Micro 6.2, SLES for SAP applications 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- bpftool SLES for SAP applications 16.0, SLES 16.0 7.5.0-160000.2.3
- binutils SLES for SAP 15 SP5, SLES for SAP 15 SP4, SLES for SAP 15 SP3 +18 more 2.45-150100.7.57.1
- perf SLE Module for Development Tools 15 SP6, openSUSE Leap 15.6 6.4.0.git33229.a3afe13a7f-150600.3.17.1
- perf SLE Module for Development Tools 15 SP7 6.4.0.git54263.0aad576b1c-150700.3.2.2
- perf SLES for SAP 15 SP3, SLES 15 SP3-LTSS, SLE High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS +1 more 5.3.18-150300.38.7.1
- perf SLES for SAP 15 SP4, SLES 15 SP4-LTSS, SLE High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS +1 more 5.14.21-150400.44.20.1
- perf SLES for SAP 15 SP5, SLES 15 SP5-LTSS, SLE High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS +1 more 5.14.21-150500.52.5.1
suse advisories SUSE-SU-2025:21195-1SUSE-SU-2025:21197-1SUSE-SU-2025:4096-1
- binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- bpftool openSUSE Leap 16.0 7.5.0-160000.2.3
- cross-rx-binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- cross-arm-binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- cross-avr-binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- cross-bpf-binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- cross-ppc-binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- cross-pru-binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
opensuse advisories openSUSE-SU-2025:20150-1openSUSE-SU-2025:15651-1
- crash Azure Linux 3.0 8.0.4-5
- crash CBL-Mariner 2.0 8.0.1-5
azure linux advisories AZL-56702AZL-56797
Azure Linux vulnerability data, Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation, from https://github.com/microsoft/AzureLinuxVulnerabilityData via OSV, under the MIT licence; changed: normalised to fixed package versions per release. MIT
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2025-1180 updated cvss 3.1
binutils: GNU Binutils ld elf-eh-frame.c _bfd_elf_write_section_eh_frame memory corruption
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 mingw-binutils, mingw32-binutils, mingw64-binutils, mingw-binutils-genericaffected: workaround, no fix available “Fix deferred”
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 binutils Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 gdb, binutils, gdb-gdbserver Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 gdb, binutils, gdb-headless, gdb-gdbserver, mingw-binutils, mingw32-binutils, +9 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 gdb, binutils, gdb-minimal, gdb-headless, binutils-gold, gdb-gdbserver, +6 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 binutils, mingw-binutils, mingw32-binutils, mingw64-binutilsnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- Proof of concept is public
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 20 mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.70% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 53% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
Exploits and checks
- vuldb.com https://vuldb.com/?submit.495381 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- sourceware.org https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32642 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- sourceware.org https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15917 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 4.0 | 2.3 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N |
| CNA | 3.1 | 3.1 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L |
| CNA | 3.0 | 3.1 | CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L |
| CNA | 2.0 | 2.6 | AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P |
| CNA | 4.0 | 2.3 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X |
Affected products
- GNU Binutils
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
References
-
vuldb.com
/?submit.495381
third-party-advisory, exploit, vdb-entry
-
sourceware.org
/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32642
issue-tracking, exploit, broken-link
-
sourceware.org
/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15917
exploit, broken-link
-
vuldb.com
/?id.295083
vdb-entry, technical-description, third-party-advisory
-
vuldb.com
/?ctiid.295083
signature, permissions-required, vdb-entry
-
gnu.org
/
product
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2025-1180
- NVD CVE-2025-1180
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.