CVE-2025-1176 json
GNU Binutils ld elflink.c _bfd_elf_gc_mark_rsec heap-based overflow
published 2025-02-11 20 mo ago modified 2026-06-17 4 mo ago also EUVD-2025-2050
- cvss
- 5.0
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.7%
- EPSS 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 52%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
A vulnerability was found in GNU Binutils 2.43 and classified as critical. This issue affects the function _bfd_elf_gc_mark_rsec of the file elflink.c of the component ld. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is named f9978defb6fab0bd8583942d97c112b0932ac814. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.
Patch / fix
- binutils Debian 14 2.45-3
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2025-1176
- binutils Ubuntu 20.04 LTS 2.34-6ubuntu1.11
- binutils Ubuntu 22.04 LTS 2.38-4ubuntu2.8
- binutils Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 2.42-4ubuntu2.5
- binutils Ubuntu Pro 16.04 LTS 2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.8+esm11
- binutils Ubuntu Pro 18.04 LTS 2.30-21ubuntu1~18.04.9+esm4
ubuntu advisories UBUNTU-CVE-2025-1176
Ubuntu security data © Canonical Ltd., from https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-security-notices via OSV; changed: normalised to fixed package versions per release. CC BY-SA 4.0
- binutils SLES 16.0, Linux Micro 6.2, SLES for SAP applications 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- bpftool SLES for SAP applications 16.0, SLES 16.0 7.5.0-160000.2.3
- binutils SLES for SAP 15 SP5, SLES for SAP 15 SP4, SLES for SAP 15 SP3 +18 more 2.45-150100.7.57.1
- perf SLE Module for Development Tools 15 SP6, openSUSE Leap 15.6 6.4.0.git33229.a3afe13a7f-150600.3.17.1
- perf SLE Module for Development Tools 15 SP7 6.4.0.git54263.0aad576b1c-150700.3.2.2
- perf SLES for SAP 15 SP3, SLES 15 SP3-LTSS, SLE High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS +1 more 5.3.18-150300.38.7.1
- perf SLES for SAP 15 SP4, SLES 15 SP4-LTSS, SLE High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS +1 more 5.14.21-150400.44.20.1
- perf SLES for SAP 15 SP5, SLES 15 SP5-LTSS, SLE High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS +1 more 5.14.21-150500.52.5.1
suse advisories SUSE-SU-2025:21195-1SUSE-SU-2025:21197-1SUSE-SU-2025:4096-1
- binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- bpftool openSUSE Leap 16.0 7.5.0-160000.2.3
- cross-rx-binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- cross-arm-binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- cross-avr-binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- cross-bpf-binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- cross-ppc-binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
- cross-pru-binutils openSUSE Leap 16.0 2.45-160000.1.1
opensuse advisories openSUSE-SU-2025:20150-1openSUSE-SU-2025:15651-1
- binutils Azure Linux 3.0 2.41-4
- gdb CBL-Mariner 2.0 11.2-4
- binutils CBL-Mariner 2.0 2.37-13
- gdb Azure Linux 3.0 13.2-9
azure linux advisories AZL-56579AZL-56652AZL-56655AZL-86934
Azure Linux vulnerability data, Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation, from https://github.com/microsoft/AzureLinuxVulnerabilityData via OSV, under the MIT licence; changed: normalised to fixed package versions per release. MIT
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2025-1176 updated cvss 5.0
binutils: GNU Binutils ld elflink.c _bfd_elf_gc_mark_rsec heap-based overflow
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 binutils Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 gdb, binutils, gdb-gdbserver Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 gdb, binutils, gdb-headless, gdb-gdbserver, mingw-binutils, mingw32-binutils, +9 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 gdb, binutils, gdb-minimal, gdb-headless, binutils-gold, gdb-gdbserver, +10 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 binutils, mingw-binutils, mingw32-binutils, mingw64-binutilsnot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- Proof of concept is public
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 20 mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.67% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 52% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
Exploits and checks
- sourceware.org https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32636 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- sourceware.org https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15913 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
- vuldb.com https://vuldb.com/?submit.495329 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 4.0 | 2.3 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N |
| CNA | 3.1 | 5.0 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L |
| CNA | 3.0 | 5.0 | CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L |
| CNA | 2.0 | 5.1 | AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
| CNA | 4.0 | 2.3 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X |
| NVD | 3.1 | 5.0 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L |
Affected products
- GNU Binutils
Classification
References
-
sourceware.org
/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f9978defb6fab0bd8583942d97c112b0932ac814
patch
-
sourceware.org
/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32636
issue-tracking, exploit, patch
-
sourceware.org
/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15913
exploit
-
vuldb.com
/?submit.495329
third-party-advisory, exploit
-
vuldb.com
/?id.295079
vdb-entry, technical-description, permissions-required, third-party-advisory
-
vuldb.com
/?ctiid.295079
signature, permissions-required, third-party-advisory
-
gnu.org
/
product
- security.netapp.com /advisory/ntap-20250411-0007/
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2025-1176
- NVD CVE-2025-1176
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.