CVE-2024-10917 json
Eclipse OpenJ9 might return an incorrect value in JNI function GetStringUTFLength
published 2024-11-11 23 mo ago modified 2026-06-17 4 mo ago also EUVD-2024-33347
- cvss
- 3.7
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.4%
- EPSS 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 36%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
In Eclipse OpenJ9 versions up to 0.47, the JNI function GetStringUTFLength may return an incorrect value which has wrapped around. From 0.48 the value is correct but may be truncated to include a smaller number of characters.
Patch / fix
- eclipse openj9 0.48.0
- java-1_8_0-ibm SLES for SAP 15 SP5, SLES for SAP 15 SP4, SLES for SAP 15 SP3 +9 more 1.8.0_sr8.40-150000.3.98.1
- java-1_8_0-ibm SLES LTSS Extended Security 12 SP5, SLES 12 SP5-LTSS 1.8.0_sr8.40-30.132.1
suse advisories SUSE-SU-2025:0675-1SUSE-SU-2025:0674-1
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 23 mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.41% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 36% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 3.7 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N |
| NVD | 3.1 | 5.3 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N |
Affected products
- Eclipse Foundation Open J9
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound
References
-
github.com
/eclipse-openj9/openj9/pull/20362
issue-tracking, patch
-
gitlab.eclipse.org
/security/cve-assignement/-/issues/47
issue-tracking, vendor-advisory
-
github.com
/eclipse-openj9/openj9/releases/tag/openj9-0.48.0
release-notes
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2024-10917
- NVD CVE-2024-10917
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.
CPEs and fixed versions use Anchore's correction of NVD's data: Added CPE configurations because not yet analyzed by NVD.