CVE-2024-10306 json
Mod_proxy_cluster: mod_proxy_cluster unauthorized mcmp requests
published 2025-04-23 18 mo ago modified 2026-10-21 18 d ago also EUVD-2025-12236
- cvss
- 5.4
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.4%
- EPSS 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 32%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
A vulnerability was found in mod_proxy_cluster. The issue is that the <Directory> directive should be replaced by the <Location> directive as the former does not restrict IP/host access as `Require ip IP_ADDRESS` would suggest. This means that anyone with access to the host might send MCMP requests that may result in adding/removing/updating nodes for the balancing. However, this host should not be accessible to the public network as it does not serve the general traffic.
Patch / fix
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 0:1.3.21-1.el10, 0:1.3.22-1.el10_0.2
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 0:1.3.22-1.el9_5.2, 0:1.3.22-1.el9_6.1
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support 0:1.3.22-1.el9_4.1
- mod_proxy_cluster RHEL 9 1.3.22-1.el9_6.1
- mod_proxy_cluster RHEL 10.0 1.3.22-1.el10_0.2
- mod_proxy_cluster RHEL 9 1.3.22-1.el9_5.2
- mod_proxy_cluster RHEL 10.0 1.3.21-1.el10
- mod_proxy_cluster RHEL 9.4 EUS 1.3.22-1.el9_4.1
red hat advisories RHSA-2025:9997RHSA-2025:9434RHSA-2025:9466RHBA-2025:2973RHBA-2025:5309
- mod_proxy_cluster AlmaLinux 9 1.3.22-1.el9_6.1
- mod_proxy_cluster AlmaLinux 10 1.3.22-1.el10_0.2
almalinux advisories ALSA-2025:9434ALSA-2025:9466
- mod_proxy_cluster Rocky Linux 9 1.3.22-1.el9_6.1
- mod_proxy_cluster Rocky Linux 10 1.3.22-1.el10_0.2
rocky linux advisories RLSA-2025:9434RLSA-2025:9466
- github.com/modcluster/mod_proxy_cluster#309 pull request
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2024-10306 updated cvss 5.4
mod_proxy_cluster: mod_proxy_cluster unauthorized MCMP requests
-
Red Hat JBoss Core Services jbcs-httpd24-mod_proxy_cluster jbcs-httpd24-mod_proxy_clusteraffected: workaround, no fix available
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9) mod_proxy_cluster 1.3.22-1.el9_5.2, mod_proxy_cluster 1.3.22-1.el9_6.1fixed: vendor fix RHBA-2025:2973
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 10) mod_proxy_cluster 1.3.21-1.el10, mod_proxy_cluster 1.3.22-1.el10_0.2fixed: vendor fix RHBA-2025:5309
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.4) mod_proxy_cluster 1.3.22-1.el9_4.1fixed: vendor fix RHSA-2025:9997
-
Red Hat JBoss Core Services 2.4.62fixed: vendor fix RHSA-2025:3453
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
CISA SSVC
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
- Assessed
- 18 mo ago
Exploit prediction
0.38% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 32% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 5.4 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N |
Affected products
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support
- Red Hat Red Hat JBoss Core Services 2.4.62
- Red Hat Red Hat JBoss Core Services
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
References
- github.com /modcluster/mod_proxy_cluster/pull/309
-
access.redhat.com
/errata/RHBA-2025:2973
vendor-advisory
-
access.redhat.com
/errata/RHBA-2025:5309
vendor-advisory
-
access.redhat.com
/errata/RHSA-2025:3453
vendor-advisory
-
access.redhat.com
/errata/RHSA-2025:9434
vendor-advisory
-
access.redhat.com
/errata/RHSA-2025:9466
vendor-advisory
-
access.redhat.com
/errata/RHSA-2025:9997
vendor-advisory
-
access.redhat.com
/security/cve/CVE-2024-10306
vdb-entry
-
bugzilla.redhat.com
/show_bug.cgi?id=2321302
issue-tracking
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2024-10306
- NVD CVE-2024-10306
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.