CVE-2020-15105 json
In Django Two-Factor Authentication, user passwords are stored in clear text in the Django session
published 2020-07-10 6 y ago modified 2026-09-10 1 mo ago also GHSA-vhr6-pvjm-9qwf , PYSEC-2020-39 , EUVD-2020-0065
- cvss
- 5.4
- version 3.1, CNA
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 0.7%
- EPSS 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 53%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Django Two-Factor Authentication before 1.12, stores the user's password in clear text in the user session (base64-encoded). The password is stored in the session when the user submits their username and password, and is removed once they complete authentication by entering a two-factor authentication code. This means that the password is stored in clear text in the session for an arbitrary amount of time, and potentially forever if the user begins the login process by entering their username and password and then leaves before entering their two-factor authentication code. The severity of this issue depends on which type of session storage you have configured: in the worst case, if you're using Django's default database session storage, then users' passwords are stored in clear text in your database. In the best case, if you're using Django's signed cookie session, then users' passwords are only stored in clear text within their browser's cookie store. In the common case of using Django's cache session store, the users' passwords are stored in clear text in whatever cache storage you have configured (typically Memcached or Redis). This has been fixed in 1.12. After upgrading, users should be sure to delete any clear text passwords that have been stored. For example, if you're using the database session backend, you'll likely want to delete any session record from the database and purge that data from any database backups or replicas. In addition, affected organizations who have suffered a database breach while using an affected version should inform their users that their clear text passwords have been compromised. All organizations should encourage users whose passwords were insecurely stored to change these passwords on any sites where they were used. As a workaround, wwitching Django's session storage to use signed cookies instead of the database or cache lessens the impact of this issue, but should not be done without a thorough understanding of the security tradeoffs of using signed cookies rather than a server-side session storage. There is no way to fully mitigate the issue without upgrading.
Patch / fix
- pypi django-two-factor-auth 1.12
- django_two-factor_authentication_project django_two-factor_authentication 1.12
Exploit prediction
0.70% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 53% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | 3.1 | 5.4 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N |
| NVD | 3.1 | 5.4 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N |
| NVD | 2.0 | 3.6 | AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N |
| GitHub | 3.1 | 5.4 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N |
Affected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypi | django-two-factor-auth | <1.12 |
1.12 |
Affected products
- Bouke django-two-factor-auth
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-312 Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information
References
-
github.com
/Bouke/django-two-factor-auth/commit/454fd9842fa6e8bb772dbf0943976bc8e3335359
web, patch, third-party-advisory
-
github.com
/Bouke/django-two-factor-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-vhr6-pvjm-9qwf
web, third-party-advisory, advisory
-
github.com
/Bouke/django-two-factor-auth/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#112---2020-07-08
web, release-notes, third-party-advisory
-
nvd.nist.gov
/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15105
advisory
-
github.com
/Bouke/django-two-factor-auth
package
-
github.com
/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/django-two-factor-auth/PYSEC-2020-39.yaml
web
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2020-15105
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-vhr6-pvjm-9qwf
- NVD CVE-2020-15105
- OSV PYSEC-2020-39
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.