CVE-2020-12062 json
The scp client in OpenSSH 8.2 incorrectly sends duplicate responses to the server upon a utimes system call failure, which allows a malicio…
published 2020-06-01 6 y ago modified 2026-10-14 25 d ago also EUVD-2020-4378
- cvss
- 7.5
- version 3.1, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 2.2%
- EPSS 2.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 82%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
The scp client in OpenSSH 8.2 incorrectly sends duplicate responses to the server upon a utimes system call failure, which allows a malicious unprivileged user on the remote server to overwrite arbitrary files in the client's download directory by creating a crafted subdirectory anywhere on the remote server. The victim must use the command scp -rp to download a file hierarchy containing, anywhere inside, this crafted subdirectory. NOTE: the vendor points out that "this attack can achieve no more than a hostile peer is already able to achieve within the scp protocol" and "utimes does not fail under normal circumstances.
Patch / fix
- Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
- Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
- Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
- openssh Debian 14, Debian 13, Debian 12 1:8.3p1-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2020-12062
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2020-12062 updated cvss 0.0
openssh: scp can send duplicate responses to the server upon a utimes system call failure leading to overwrite of arbitrary files
-
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 openssh Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 openssh, openssh-ldap, openssh-server, openssh-askpass, openssh-clients, pam_ssh_agent_auth Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 openssh, openssh-cavs, openssh-ldap, openssh-keycat, openssh-server, openssh-askpass, +3 more Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 openssh, openssh-cavs, openssh-ldap, openssh-keycat, openssh-server, openssh-askpass, +2 morenot affected: vulnerable code not present
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
cisa ICSA-23-348-10 updated cvss 7.5
Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500
-
Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= 3.1.0, < 3.1.5 Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= 3.1.0, < 3.1.5 Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= 3.1.0, < 3.1.5 Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= 3.1.0, < 3.1.5 Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= 3.1.0, < 3.1.5affected: fixed in V3.1.5, mitigation support.industry.siemens.com
Facts from CISA's republication of the vendor's own advisory (CSAF); the linked advisory is the authoritative source. CISA notification · csaf
Exploit prediction
2.23% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 82% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 3.1 | 7.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
| NVD | 2.0 | 5.0 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N |
Affected products
- Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP
- Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP
- Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
References
-
github.com
/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/955854cafca88e0cdcd3d09ca1ad4ada465364a1
patch, third-party-advisory
-
github.com
/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/aad87b88fc2536b1ea023213729aaf4eaabe1894
third-party-advisory
-
openssh.com
/txt/release-8.3
release-notes, vendor-advisory
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2020/05/27/1
mailing-list, release-notes, third-party-advisory
- cert-portal.siemens.com /productcert/html/ssa-398330.html
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2020-12062
- NVD CVE-2020-12062
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.