CVE-2019-7273 json
Optergy Proton/Enterprise devices allow Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
published 2019-07-01 7 y ago modified 2026-06-17 4 mo ago also EUVD-2019-16817
- cvss
- 8.8
- version 3.1, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 4.5%
- EPSS 4.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 91%
- public exploits
- 1
- Exploit-DB
Summary
Optergy Proton/Enterprise devices allow Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
cisa ICSA-19-157-01 updated cvss 9.9
Optergy Proton Enterprise Building Management System
-
Optergy Proton/Enterprise <= 2.3.0aaffected: mitigation “Update Optergy server to Version 2.4.5 (or later) to remediate the issues described in this advisory (Proton and Optergy Enterprise).”
From CISA ICS and IT advisories (CSAF, https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF), a U.S. Government work; changed: reduced to products, statuses and remediations. CISA notification · csaf
Timeline
- Published
- First public exploit (EDB-47639)
Exploit prediction
4.48% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 91% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
Exploits and checks
- EDB-47639 Optergy 2.3.0a - Cross-Site Request Forgery (Add Admin) webapps, 2019-11-12
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 3.1 | 8.8 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| NVD | 2.0 | 6.8 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery
References
-
applied-risk.com
/labs/advisories
broken-link, not-applicable, third-party-advisory
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/108686
vdb-entry, broken-link, third-party-advisory
-
applied-risk.com
/resources/ar-2019-008
third-party-advisory
-
packetstormsecurity.com
/files/155265/Optergy-Proton-Enterprise-BMS-2.0.3a-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html
third-party-advisory, vdb-entry
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2019-7273
- NVD CVE-2019-7273
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.