Skip to content
Fencer Vulns
high 7.2

CVE-2019-1914 in the critical feed json

Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches Command Injection Vulnerability

published 2019-08-07 7 y ago modified 2026-06-17 4 mo ago also EUVD-2019-10471

cvss
7.2
version 3.0, CNA
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
24.9%
EPSS 24.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 97%
public exploits
1
Exploit-DB

Summary

A vulnerability in the web management interface of Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a command injection attack. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malicious request to certain parts of the web management interface. To send the malicious request, the attacker needs a valid login session in the web management interface as a privilege level 15 user. Depending on the configuration of the affected switch, the malicious request must be sent via HTTP or HTTPS. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the root user.

Patch / fix

  • Cisco Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Plus Switches 1.1.4.4

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. First public exploit (EDB-47442)

CISA SSVC

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
total
Assessed
23 mo ago

Exploit prediction

24.85% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 97% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).

Exploits and checks

  • EDB-47442 Cisco Small Business 220 Series - Multiple Vulnerabilities remote, 2019-09-30

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
CNA 3.0 7.2 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD 3.0 7.2 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD 2.0 9.0 AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C

Affected products

  • Cisco Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Plus Switches

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-20 Improper Input Validation

References

Sources

Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.