CVE-2009-1469 json
CRLF injection vulnerability in the Forgot Password implementation in server/webmail.php in IceWarp eMail Server and WebMail Server before…
published 2009-05-05 17 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2009-1467
- cvss
- 4.3
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 4.9%
- EPSS 4.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 92%
- public exploits
- 1
- Exploit-DB
Summary
CRLF injection vulnerability in the Forgot Password implementation in server/webmail.php in IceWarp eMail Server and WebMail Server before 9.4.2 makes it easier for remote attackers to trick a user into disclosing credentials via CRLF sequences preceding a Reply-To header in the subject element of an XML document, as demonstrated by triggering an e-mail message from the server that contains a user's correct credentials, and requests that the user compose a reply that includes this message.
Timeline
- First public exploit (EDB-32986)
- Published
Exploit prediction
4.86% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 92% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
Exploits and checks
- EDB-32986 IceWarp Merak Mail Server 9.4.1 - 'Forgot Password' Input Validation webapps, 2009-05-05
- redteam-pentesting.de http://www.redteam-pentesting.de/advisories/rt-sa-2009-004 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 4.3 | AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code
References
-
redteam-pentesting.de
/advisories/rt-sa-2009-004
exploit
-
osvdb.org
/54229
vdb-entry
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/34827
vdb-entry
-
securityfocus.com
/archive/1/503227/100/0/threaded
mailing-list
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2009/1253
vdb-entry
-
securitytracker.com
/id?1022166
vdb-entry
-
exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
/vulnerabilities/50332
vdb-entry
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2009-1469
- NVD CVE-2009-1469
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.