CVE-2008-5005 json
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in (1) University of Washington IMAP Toolkit 2002 through 2007c, (2) University of Washington Alpine…
published 2008-11-10 17 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2008-4984
- cvss
- 10.0
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 6.4%
- EPSS 6.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 93%
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in (1) University of Washington IMAP Toolkit 2002 through 2007c, (2) University of Washington Alpine 2.00 and earlier, and (3) Panda IMAP allow (a) local users to gain privileges by specifying a long folder extension argument on the command line to the tmail or dmail program; and (b) remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending e-mail to a destination mailbox name composed of a username and '+' character followed by a long string, processed by the tmail or possibly dmail program.
Patch / fix
- uw-imap Debian 12 7:2007d~dfsg-1
debian advisories DEBIAN-CVE-2008-5005
- imap RHEL 3 1:2002d-15
- imap-utils RHEL 3 1:2002d-15
red hat advisories RHSA-2009:0275
Vendor advisories
What the vendors themselves say about their products: affected, fixed or not affected, and what to do.
red hat product security vex CVE-2008-5005 updated
uw-imap: buffer overflow in dmail and tmail
-
Red Hat Desktop version 3 imap 2002d-15, imap-utils 2002d-15 Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS version 3 imap 2002d-15, imap-utils 2002d-15 Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES version 3 imap 2002d-15, imap-utils 2002d-15 Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS version 3 imap 2002d-15, imap-utils 2002d-15fixed: vendor fix RHSA-2009:0275
Red Hat CSAF VEX © Red Hat, Inc., from https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/; changed: reduced to product statuses and remediations. CC BY 4.0 · csaf
Exploit prediction
6.35% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 93% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 10.0 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
References
-
bugzilla.redhat.com
/show_bug.cgi?id=469667
patch
-
mailman2.u.washington.edu
/pipermail/imap-uw/2008-October/002267.html
mailing-list, patch
-
redhat.com
/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-November/msg00082.html
vendor-advisory
-
debian.org
/security/2008/dsa-1685
vendor-advisory
-
redhat.com
/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-November/msg00058.html
vendor-advisory
-
rhn.redhat.com
/errata/RHSA-2009-0275.html
vendor-advisory
-
mandriva.com
/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:146
vendor-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/32483
third-party-advisory, vendor-advisory
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10485
vdb-entry, signature
- panda.com /imap/
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2008/11/03/3
mailing-list
-
bitsec.com
/en/rad/bsa-081103.txt
url-repurposed
-
bitsec.com
/en/rad/bsa-081103.c
url-repurposed
- support.avaya.com /elmodocs2/security/ASA-2009-065.htm
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2008/11/03/5
mailing-list
- washington.edu /alpine/tmailbug.html
-
securityreason.com
/securityalert/4570
third-party-advisory
-
securityfocus.com
/archive/1/498002/100/0/threaded
mailing-list
-
mailman2.u.washington.edu
/pipermail/imap-uw/2008-October/002268.html
mailing-list
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/32072
vdb-entry
-
exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
/vulnerabilities/46281
vdb-entry
-
secunia.com
/advisories/33142
third-party-advisory
-
marc.info
/?l=full-disclosure&m=122572590212610&w=4
mailing-list
-
secunia.com
/advisories/33996
third-party-advisory
-
secunia.com
/advisories/32512
third-party-advisory
-
openwall.com
/lists/oss-security/2008/11/03/4
mailing-list
-
vupen.com
/english/advisories/2008/3042
vdb-entry
-
securitytracker.com
/id?1021131
vdb-entry
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2008-5005
- NVD CVE-2008-5005
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.