CVE-2004-1520 json
Stack-based buffer overflow in IPSwitch IMail 8.13 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long IMAP DELETE comma…
published 2004-12-31 21 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2004-1514
- cvss
- 4.6
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 88.5%
- EPSS 88.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 99.7%
- public exploits
- 5
- Metasploit, Exploit-DB
Summary
Stack-based buffer overflow in IPSwitch IMail 8.13 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long IMAP DELETE command.
Patch / fix
- securityfocus.com/bid/11675 patch
- secunia.com/advisories/13200 advisory
Timeline
- First public exploit (Metasploit exploit/windows/imap/imail_delete)
- Published
Exploit prediction
88.51% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 99.7% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
Exploits and checks
- Metasploit exploit/windows/imap/imail_delete IMail IMAP4D Delete Overflow metasploit exploit, average rank, 2004-11-12
- Metasploit exploit/windows/imap/mdaemon_cram_md5 Mdaemon 8.0.3 IMAPD CRAM-MD5 Authentication Overflow metasploit exploit, great rank, 2004-11-12
- EDB-16479 IPSwitch IMail IMAP4D - Delete Overflow (Metasploit) remote, 2010-09-20
- EDB-1151 MDaemon 8.0.3 - IMAPD CRAM-MD5 Authentication Overflow (Metasploit) remote, 2005-08-12
- EDB-627 IPSwitch IMail 8.13 - 'DELETE' Remote Stack Overflow remote, 2004-11-12
- securityfocus.com http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11675 referenced PoC, tagged "exploit" by a source, unverified
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 4.6 | AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P |
References
-
secunia.com
/advisories/13200
third-party-advisory, patch, vendor-advisory
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/11675
vdb-entry, exploit, patch
-
marc.info
/?l=bugtraq&m=110037283803560&w=2
mailing-list
-
exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
/vulnerabilities/18058
vdb-entry
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2004-1520
- NVD CVE-2004-1520
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.