CVE-2004-1060 json
Multiple TCP/IP and ICMP implementations, when using Path MTU (PMTU) discovery (PMTUD), allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service…
published 2004-04-12 22 y ago modified 2026-06-16 4 mo ago also EUVD-2004-1058
- cvss
- 5.0
- version 2.0, NVD
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- 74.7%
- EPSS 74.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days, percentile 99.5%
- public exploits
- 2
- Exploit-DB
Summary
Multiple TCP/IP and ICMP implementations, when using Path MTU (PMTU) discovery (PMTUD), allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (network throughput reduction for TCP connections) via forged ICMP ("Fragmentation Needed and Don't Fragment was Set") packets with a low next-hop MTU value, aka the "Path MTU discovery attack." NOTE: CVE-2004-0790, CVE-2004-0791, and CVE-2004-1060 have been SPLIT based on different attacks; CVE-2005-0065, CVE-2005-0066, CVE-2005-0067, and CVE-2005-0068 are related identifiers that are SPLIT based on the underlying vulnerability. While CVE normally SPLITs based on vulnerability, the attack-based identifiers exist due to the variety and number of affected implementations and solutions that address the attacks instead of the underlying vulnerabilities.
Timeline
- Published
- First public exploit (EDB-25388)
Exploit prediction
74.67% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 99.5% of all scored CVEs (FIRST EPSS, 2026-11-08).
Exploits and checks
CVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVD | 2.0 | 5.0 | AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P |
References
-
securityfocus.com
/archive/1/418882/100/0/threaded
vendor-advisory
-
cisco.com
/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050412-icmp.shtml
vendor-advisory
-
marc.info
/?l=bugtraq&m=112861397904255&w=2
vendor-advisory
-
docs.microsoft.com
/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2005/ms05-019
vendor-advisory
-
gont.com.ar
/drafts/icmp-attacks-against-tcp.html
vendor-advisory
-
uniras.gov.uk
/niscc/docs/al-20050412-00308.html?lang=en
vendor-advisory
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A181
vdb-entry, signature
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A196
vdb-entry, signature
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A780
vdb-entry, signature
-
securityfocus.com
/bid/13124
vdb-entry
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A3826
vdb-entry, signature
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A405
vdb-entry, signature
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A899
vdb-entry, signature
-
secunia.com
/advisories/18317
third-party-advisory
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A2188
vdb-entry, signature
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A651
vdb-entry, signature
-
securityreason.com
/securityalert/19
third-party-advisory
-
securityreason.com
/securityalert/57
third-party-advisory
-
oval.cisecurity.org
/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5386
vdb-entry, signature
Sources
- CVE List CVE-2004-1060
- NVD CVE-2004-1060
Fencer Vulns keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.